gmat作文机考是否有字数统计

　　gmat作文机考是有字数统计的。
　　在进行GMAT作文写作的时候，对于GMAT作文字数要求也是需要做一个相关的了解的，官方钦定满分的范文，其最明显的优点在于：
　　1、字数高达599words, 充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。
　　2、标准的五段制，首段、末端，中间三段，看上去很美。
　　3、没有陈词滥调、满篇废话的模板式语言。
　　GMAT作文字数对于GMAT作文评分也有一定的帮助，最好是在一个范围内的。在prep的AWA界面，一行平均在18-20个单词之间，为简化计算，按每行20个单词来计算。注意，在这里，无论是完整的一行，还是只有几个单词的一行，都记为单独的一行，用来简化计算。凡是一行，都按20个单词来计算。
　　可以得出：三行的段落60单词，四行的段落80单词，五行的段落100单词，通常会写4-5段，建议段落不要少于3行，也要多于6行。

GMAT作文字数两种方法：第一种，GMAT作文要求作文字数在500字左右为好，根据统计，在考试过程中，打字时每行约有18到22个单词，那么根据估算，基本上写一篇约占25行的作文就满足字数要求了第二种，在打字过程中，当前显示页打满之后会在屏幕右侧出现滑块，和平时word文档类似，那么当滑块的长度约占整个光标长度的三分之一到四分之一时，作文的字数就够了~

查看原帖>>

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: 　　Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money. 　　Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. 　　首段　　This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the wor